TechCrunch Comment on Station Directors Selecting “Best” Podcasts
August 29th, 2006by Lee Gibbons, Podango CEO
This is the essence of Podango’s differentiation, so I feel that a post to state Podango’s vision and intent might be helpful to some, especially given the type of comments on the TechCrunch site.
Here are a few of the comments that are inspring this post:
by: juanna-laloca
“and, as a podcaster, what will happen if I decide I don’t want these “experts” deciding if my podcasts are worthy? Will my shows “cease to exist”? This is like about.com deciding what info is worth linking to by their ‘experts’. One of my shows is directed to people in the…”
by: garrett
“One of the selling points of Podcasts is that they’re “audio-on-demand”, surely taking various podcasts and creating channels from them “like old-style television and radio stations” goes against the grain of this concept…”
by: Bret
This is what I love about the blogosphere, people ask quesitons and they get answers. It is amazingly simple, and infinitely useful.
Here are the ponits I would like to make in response to these comments and others like them:
Each Station Director serves a niche market by sifting sorting and prioritizing podcasts and making them availabe over a single RSS channel. But the really cool thing about Podango is that each station functions as a web 2.0 application that allows the station director to monitor analytics, ratings, reviews, a forum dedicated to his station, and direct feedback via castbacks (audio feedback) that will guide his choices. This feedback and rataings system is available to all, so that it keeps the Station Director honest, if you will.
Station Directors are obligated by contract to treat Podcasters fairly and to always have a distribution agreement with any Podcaster whose podcast is included in the Station programming. Further, we never require that a podcaster sign on with Podango exclusively. They retain their own feed and all rights to it. They also have the right to end their affiliation with any Podango station at any time, and take their feed with them. If they have been hosting with us, we will even give them a chance to redirect to a different url for their site and feed. Our best hold on podcasters will only ever be their satisfaction with Podango and the Station Directors with whom they associate.
Listeners truly are the biggest winners in the Podango scheme of things. They get a great stream of relevant content that is always fresh as part of the Podango Station’s standard feed. And, like Bret said, they can also get in a tweak their feed so that it si customized to their tastes. What is really cool is that they can also do things like go back and tell Podango to give them all the episodes of a given podcast one after another, daily, until they have heard all the episodes up to the current one, and Podango will do that on their custom RSS feed. They can even select which ones to include or leave out. There is just a bunch of flexibility provided so that users truly are in control. How much control do they have over standard podcast feeds that re one-size-fits all, and the benevolent dictator over what they hear is the podaster?
In concieving of Podango, Doug Smith and I were confronted with the decision about whether to make it all Station Director driven, or all end-user, wisdom of the crowd driven. Our conclusion was that having both would be ideal. The Station Director who is passionate about an area of interest and who actually owns his Station can act as a benevolent dictator of sorts, facilitating rich conversations within her community of interest and be very responsive to the best web 2.0 feedback mechanisms. We believe this “guided evolotion” method will allow stations to better serve their communities. It will also prevent what we have observed on Digg and Technorati and other social web apps where a few very selfish and self-serving loud mouths create vicious feedback cycles that hurt the quality of the experience. I believe that if a Station Director acts like a selfish idiot, the market will respond by voting with their feet.
For what it is worth. That is the intent of having Station Directors in our model.
Sure hope it pans out as planned. If you see risks I should be aware of or have ideas of how to mitigate any, please let me know (lee@podango.com).
